Recently, our company adopts e-payment when dealing with
suppliers. This way, we are helping suppliers eliminate the need to travel for check
collections and countless trips to the banks. It’s a small deed done from us for
suppliers to save their time and cost. A little effort to reduce some processes
might add user-friendliness element to the business world, be it environmentally
by reducing carbon footprint, or efficiency by reducing time taken to complete
the whole payment process.
Remote Support |
On the same issue, I read this related article from
Detektor, a security magazine, November/December 2012 issue entitled, “Remote
Maintenance: The Key to 21st Century Customer Care”; which stated that despite
the obvious benefits of using high-tech maintenance solutions, some installers
are still reluctant to embrace the change. A desire for face-to-face
interaction, tradition, and caution about the ramifications on their business
model are the key hurdles to this hesitancy.
All these years, we at FingerTec set remote maintenance as one
of our business goals, and we focus hard to make sure that we reduce sales follow-ups
to conclude sales in no time, and reduce on-site technical supports along the
way. Our holistic self-sufficient online model comprehensively handles everything
from marketing material to sales resources, from training to warranty claim
process plus 24/7 online technical supports by deploying online tools. Our
somewhat trivial move to print support@fingertec.com
beneath the logo on FingerTec hardware products largely shows our commitment in
sharing the end-customer’s support responsibilities with our worldwide
partners.
If majority of our resellers share our resources and adopt
our remote maintenance strategy to a certain extend in their sales and
technical supports, I reckon they would increase their sales revenue and make
better profit by improving the overall process.
But the truth is, the reluctance is still abundance amongst
our partners. The article also mentioned that quite some installers perceived
loss of potential revenue by not sending a technician out to fix a problem. In
fact, this is not the case if installers can work out their math to see if they
can manage the problem remotely and satisfies the customers at the same time.
And, with more and more services offered online nowadays, I would say that
customers are used to and willing to accept remote services, even when maintenance
contracts are signed. Because, solving the problems is their utmost priority
and they would consider any means possible to get it done.
It is such a waste to not tap on the remote strategy if the
tools are widely and cheaply available. Combining this with green environment
concerns, who would refuse the rewards derived from remote maintenance??